[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ksync: Current status of KSync? It seems pretty inactive


I see a lot more community support and action happening around Sync4J.  
I think any time would be better spent supporting that active effort 
rather than trying to resurrect this one.

Brent

Alex Muc wrote:

> The last message in the archives may very well be from me.  I was 
> trying to use KSync at that point in time.  I've got some 
> documentation that I added to KSync around that time.  I don't think 
> Oleg ever actually incorporated it into the main KSync distribution 
> though.  KSync 1.0 is very difficult to understand, my documentation 
> helped to make it somewhat clearer.  I can send in what I have if 
> someone wants to receive it.
>
> I'd be willing to spend some time bringing KSync back to life.  Anyone 
> else?
>
> Alex.
>
> Alexandr Koloskov wrote:
>
>> Guys.
>>
>> Let me as one of the co-authors of kSync to bring some light at the
>> situation. We were released kSync 1.0 almost a year ago and we had a
>> great plans for this software. However, due to lack of community support
>> and overall company interest shift to BREW platform this project was
>> conservated. Also we have built kSync v.2.0 which was built on entirely
>> different code base, so it has nothing common in terms of source code w/
>> kSync 1.0, but it was built for our internal purposes and we don't want
>> to release it as open-source.
>> So, entire picture is a bit sad. However, if community has an interest
>> to this project, I'm and Oleg (main author of kSync) are available for
>> answers and probably we can help with some issues or even with evolution
>> of this software. We just can't do it alone.
>>
>> -- 
>> Alexandr Koloskov
>> Director of Development, Reaxion Corp.
>>
>> E-Mail:  alexk@reaxion.com
>> WWW: www.reaxion.com
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ksync-admin@enhydra.org [mailto:ksync-admin@enhydra.org] On Behalf
>> Of Brent Hale
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:35 PM
>> To: ksync@enhydra.org
>> Subject: Ksync: Current status of KSync? It seems pretty inactive
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone out there?
>>
>> The last message I see in the archives is June 3, 2002.  I've read about
>> a
>> version 2.0 being available, but surprised that I can't find it on the
>> site.
>>
>> I'm in the evaluation stage and am looking at this and Sync4J.  KSync
>> appears to have released one, but the inactivity leads me to believe
>> that
>> KSync doesn't work well.  Any comments would be helpful.
>>
>> Brent Hale
>> Eventronix Inc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ksync mailing list
>> Ksync@enhydra.org
>> http://support.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ksync
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ksync mailing list
>> Ksync@enhydra.org
>> http://support.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ksync
>>
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ksync mailing list
> Ksync@enhydra.org
> http://support.enhydra.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ksync